Solar energy has become one of the most promising and sustainable sources of power in recent years. As solar panel technology advances, new types of panels have emerged to meet different needs and environments. Two common types are monofacial and bifacial solar panel. While they both serve the same primary purpose—converting sunlight into electricity—they differ significantly in design, performance, and efficiency.
Monofacial vs Bifacial Solar Panel
Definition and Structure
Monofacial Solar Panels
These panels have a single active side that captures sunlight. Manufacturers cover the front side with photovoltaic (PV) cells, while they typically cover the back with an opaque backsheet to protect the panel. Engineers design monofacial panels to absorb sunlight only from the front surface.
Bifacial Solar Panels
Engineers design bifacial panels to capture sunlight on both the front and back sides. They have PV cells on both surfaces, and manufacturers usually cover the back with transparent glass or a clear backsheet, allowing the panel to absorb reflected light from the ground or surroundings.
Energy Generation and Efficiency
Monofacial Panel
Since they only capture sunlight from one side, monofacial panels generate electricity solely based on direct sunlight hitting the front surface. The intensity and angle of the sunlight they receive limit their energy output.
Bifacial Panel
Because they use both direct and reflected sunlight, bifacial panels can produce up to 10%–30% more energy than monofacial ones, depending on the installation setup and the reflectivity of the surface beneath them (e.g., white concrete, snow, or sand can increase performance).
Installation Considerations
Monofacial PV Panels
People typically install them on rooftops or ground-mounted systems where the back side is not exposed to light. They are easier and cheaper to install in most residential settings.
Bifacial PV Panels
These require more specific installation conditions to maximize rear-side exposure. Experts consider them best suited for open areas, elevated mounts, or solar farms with reflective ground surfaces. Proper spacing and tilt are essential for optimal performance.
Cost and Return on Investment
Monofacial Solar PV Panels
Generally, monofacial solar pv panels are less expensive upfront and are cost-effective for standard applications. They are widely used in homes and small-scale projects.
Bifacial Solar PV Panels
Although they may have a higher initial cost due to advanced materials and mounting requirements, bifacial solar pv panels can offer a better long-term return on investment, especially in large-scale or commercial solar installations.
Applications
Monofacial Solar Panel
These panels are ideal for residential rooftops, small-scale installations, or areas with limited space where only one side can be exposed to sunlight. They are also suitable for regions with lower sunlight reflection.
Bifacial Solar Panel
Bifacial solar panel is commonly used in large-scale solar farms, commercial installations, or areas with reflective surfaces like deserts or snowy regions. They are also popular in floating solar systems and vertical installations where both sides can capture light.
Durability and Maintenance
Monofacial Solar Module
The opaque backsheet protects the panel from environmental factors, making monofacial solar module durable and easy to maintain. They are less prone to damage from debris or shading on the back.
Bifacial Solar Module
Bifacial solar module, with glass on both sides, are also durable but may require more maintenance to keep both surfaces clean. Dust or debris on the back can reduce efficiency, especially in dusty or polluted environments.
Which is Better: Bifacial or Monofacial Solar Panels
Determining whether bifacial or monofacial solar panels are better depends on specific project requirements, budget, installation conditions, and goals. Below is a concise analysis comparing the two to help you decide which is better for your needs.
Energy Output
Bifacial
Superior energy output, typically 5-30% higher than monofacial panels, due to dual-sided light capture (front + reflected light from the back). Best in high-albedo environments (e.g., white roofs, snow, sand).
Monofacial
Reliable but lower output, as they only capture sunlight on the front. No benefit from reflected light.
Better
Bifacial, if conditions (reflective surfaces, elevated mounting) are optimized.
Cost
Bifacial
Higher upfront costs due to advanced design, dual-sided PV cells, and specialized mounting systems. However, higher energy yield can offset costs over time.
Monofacial
More affordable, with simpler design and standard installation requirements, making them cost-effective for budget-conscious projects.
Winner
Monofacial for lower initial investment; bifacial for long-term savings in high-yield setups.
Installation Flexibility
Bifacial
Requires specific conditions—elevated mounting, unobstructed back side, and reflective surfaces—to maximize output. Less ideal for rooftops or shaded areas.
Monofacial
Versatile, suitable for various settings (rooftops, ground mounts) without needing reflective ground cover or high clearance.
Better
Monofacial for ease and flexibility of installation.
Maintenance
Bifacial
Both sides need cleaning to maintain efficiency, especially in dusty or polluted areas, increasing maintenance effort.
Monofacial
Only the front side requires cleaning, and the opaque backsheet protects against debris, reducing maintenance needs.
Winner
Monofacial for lower maintenance.
Applications
Bifacial
Ideal for large-scale solar farms, floating solar systems, or vertical installations in reflective environments (e.g., deserts, snowy regions).
Monofacial
Better for residential rooftops, urban settings, or areas with low reflectivity where back-side light capture is minimal.
Warranty and Lifespan
Monofacial
Typical warranty: 25 years for performance (80% output retention), 10-15 years for product. Proven technology with long track record.
Bifacial
Similar warranties: 25-30 years for performance, 10-15 years for product. Newer technology, so long-term durability data is still emerging.
Which is Better?
Choose Bifacial Solar Panel If:
- You’re installing in a high-albedo environment (e.g., white gravel, snow) or large-scale project with optimized mounting (e.g., trackers, elevated racks).
- Maximizing energy output is a priority, and you can afford higher upfront costs.
- Long-term savings from higher efficiency outweigh initial investment.
Example: A solar farm in a desert with reflective sand and tracking systems.
Choose Monofacial Solar Panel If:
- You have a limited budget or need a cost-effective solution.
- The installation site is a rooftop, urban area, or low-reflectivity environment where back-side light capture is negligible.
- Simpler installation and lower maintenance are priorities.
Example: A residential rooftop in a city with standard mounting.
Neither is universally “better”—it depends on your context. Bifacial solar panels excel in energy output and are ideal for large, reflective, optimized installations but come with higher costs and complexity. Monofacial solar panels are more affordable, versatile, and easier to maintain, making them suitable for standard or constrained settings. Evaluate your site conditions, budget, and energy goals to make the best choice.
The Articles You may Like
- How Long Will a 24V 200Ah Lithium Battery Last
- Top 7 Benefits of Using Zero Export Grid Tie Inverter
- Understanding N-Type TOPCon Solar Panels
- A Guide to Residential Energy Storage System ESS
- Steps to Configure Zero Export on Hybrid Grid Tie Inverter
- Top Tips: what should consumers consider before buying a solar street lamp